Swords v. Harleysville Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 Wayne Swords owned a registered but uninsured automobile. Swords was involved in an accident while driving a car owned by his father and insured by Pennland, a company related to the Harleysville Insurance Companies.1 He sued for medical benefits and lost wages under 75 Pa.C.S.A § 1712.2 The trial court allowed the benefits. We reverse and remand to the trial court for the entry of a declaration in favor of Harleysville.3
*643¶ 2 In finding that HarleysviUe owed an obligation to Swords to provide medical and wage loss benefits, the trial court relied on Kafando v. State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WickettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Henrich v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swords v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Santorella v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006