Legal Opinion

Swords v. Harleysville Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Wayne Swords owned a registered but uninsured automobile. Swords was involved in an accident while driving a car owned by his father and insured by Pennland, a company related to the Harleysville Insurance Companies.1 He sued for medical benefits and lost wages under 75 Pa.C.S.A § 1712.2 The trial court allowed the benefits. We reverse and remand to the trial court for the entry of a declaration in favor of Harleysville.3

*643¶ 2 In finding that HarleysviUe owed an obligation to Swords to provide medical and wage loss benefits, the trial court relied on Kafando v. State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WickettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Henrich v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swords v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Santorella v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API