Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 136

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided November 21, 2013No. 98 OAG 136Published

1Opinion of the Court

136] [98 Op. Att’y COMMERCIAL LAW LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS CONTAINERS – POTENTIAL CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF SUPPLIERS THAT REMOVE COMPETITOR’S TANK November 21, 2013 The Honorable Edward D.E. Rollins, III State’s Attorney for Cecil County The Maryland Liquefied Petroleum Gas Container Law makes it a misdemeanor, among other things, to “take,” “or otherwise use, dispose of, or traffic in” a liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) storage tank marked as belonging to another without the written consent of the owner. Md. Code Ann., Comm. Law (“CL”) §§ 11-603, 11-604, 11-606 (2013 Repl. Vol.); see generally CL…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API