Legal Opinion

Casey v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 2016No. 1004578; A152297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Claimant injured his left shoulder in 2002 while working for the City of Portland (employer) and filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. In addition to “boilerplate” language stating that claimant’s rights would be lost if he did not take certain actions within specified timeframes, employer’s claim denial also included this statement: “If in the future you are diagnosed with a condition that you or your physician believe to be related to this exposure with [employer], your claim will be reconsidered for possible acceptance.” Notwithstanding that statement, employer denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Tattoo v. Barrett Business ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. USF Reddaway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API