Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lynn Lumbard v. City of Ann Arbor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2019No. 18-1258Published

1ConcurrenceKethledge, Circuit Judge

CONCURRENCE

To find a good illustration of the law of unintended consequences, one need look no further than the Supreme Court's decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City , 473 U.S. 172 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985). The Court's actual holding was pedestrian: that Hamilton Bank's takings claim was unripe because the bank had not exhausted its administrative remedies, specifically its right to ask the County for a variance to develop the property in the manner proposed. Id. at 193-94 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 . In dictum, however-dictum in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Haywood v. DrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Wayside Church v. Van Buren CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API