Legal Opinion · Dissent

Escobedo v. Nickita

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 2006No. 05-315Published

1DissentJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. The characterizes the issue in this case as whether Rusty Wayne Escobedo’s “opportunity interest” in forming a relationship with his infant daughter was “adequately protected.” This court concludes that Escobedo’s opportunity interest was adequately protected by his receipt of notice four business days before an adoption hearing regarding a child he did not know existed. I believe that Escobedo was denied the opportunity to legitimate his daughter in contravention of his right as a putative father under the United States Constitution. Also, common law principles…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hodgson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Matter of Adoption of DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Verser v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API