Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scoggins v. Medlock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 5, 2011No. 10-246Published

1DissentJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. Contrary to the majority opinion, Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-10-108 (Repl.2009) is not the exclusive means to determine paternity. According to the majority, the paternity of a child may only be determined during the lifetime of that child. The statutes cited by the majority do not so provide. Such an interpretation defeats the clear legislative intent under the wrongful-death statute that a father may be a beneficiary. See Ark.Code Ann. § 16 — 62—102(d) (Supp. 1999). If the majority is correct, the putative father of a child who dies leaving property may not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HandcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Ludwig v. Bella Casa, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Village Market, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Roque v. FrederickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API