Sanford-Day Iron Works v. Enterprise Foundry & Machine Works
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sullivan Connty to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Snpreme Court. — Hal. H. Haynes, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gbeen
This bill was filed to restrain defendant Enterprise Foundry & Machine Works from unfair competition in the use of the name “Whitney” as applied to car wheels manufactured by it. Complainant, Sanford-Day Iron Works, claimed the right to the use of this name in connection with such wheels, and sought the protection of this right by its bill.
Proof was taken, and the chancellor rendered a decree enjoining defendant Enterprise Foundry & Machine Works from using the name “Whitney,” except in a certain manner set out in the decree. The court of civil appeals reversed the chancellor’s decree and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanford-Day Iron Works v. Interprise Foundry & Machine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Neuhoff, Inc. v. Neuhoff Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948