Legal Opinion

Giglio v. Carucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: By filing the note of issue and statement of readiness, plaintiff waived her right to further discovery (Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038, 1039; Riggle v Buffalo Gen. Hosp., 52 AD2d 751, 752). "Only where there are present 'special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances, spelled out factually,’ has Special Term discretion to depart from the rule which forecloses discovery proceedings after the statement of readiness has been filed” (Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v Pomeroy Real Estate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Pomeroy Real Estate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Doll v. KleinklausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Riggle v. Buffalo General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Giddens v. MoultrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laudico v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Joseph v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Yunis v. YunisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API