Legal Opinion

United States v. Gast

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 3, 1969No. Crim. A. No. 1750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, District Judge.

A claim has been filed under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, for compensation of an attorney appointed to represent the defendant at hearings on an application to revoke probation.

The grand jury for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division charged the defendant in a five-count indictment with forging and uttering two United States Postal Money Orders in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 500 and for obstructing correspondence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1702. The case was transferred to this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. NaplesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  3. United States v. RountreeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. United States v. BoydenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ayestas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API