Legal Opinion

Cooey v. Strickland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2009No. 09-4300PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active1 judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Additional separate writings may follow..…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Moore v. ReesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
  3. Reynolds v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API