Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Reynolds v. Strickland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 5, 2010No. 10-3220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Concurring in the judgmentSutton, Circuit Judge

ORDER

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, joined by COLE, Circuit Judge.

Lawrence Reynolds, an inmate on Ohio’s death row, seeks to stay his execution currently set for March 9, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. We regretfully DENY the stay.

Reynolds challenges Ohio’s lethal injection protocol under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Reynolds was previously set to be executed on October 8, 2009. But, in light of alarming difficulties on Ohio’s part in executing several other death row inmates using the protocol in place at that time, we stayed Reynolds’ execution pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Reynolds v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. COOEY II v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Reynolds v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API