Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooey v. Strickland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 12, 2010No. 10-3598Published

1Dissent

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

Michael Beuke seeks a stay of his execution on the basis that an anti-seizure medication that he has been taking for some time would interact negatively and painfully with one of the drugs in the Plan B intramuscular injection, should his executioners encounter difficulty administering the State of Ohio’s new one-drug injection protocol. At a hearing before the district court, Beuke presented evidence that there was a concrete possibility that such a reaction could occur, but the district court found that he had failed to prove that it was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Philip Workman v. Governor Phil BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Cooey v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API