People v. Santiago
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court’s failure to grant defendant’s motions for a mistrial was error. Any prejudice to the defendant which might have arisen due to the brief mention of uncharged criminal activity which was made at defendant’s trial was alleviated when the court sustained defendant’s objections and took prompt curative action. Hence, defendant’s motions for a mistrial were properly denied. Moreover, if defendant was of the view that the curative instructions which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by377 opinions
- People v. BlasichNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. CattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Roldan v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- People v. BlackshearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. RagsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
372 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.