People v. Ragsdale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding expert testimony on false confessions and as to the defendant’s susceptibility to police interrogation techniques (see People v Lee, 96 NY2d 157, 162 [2001]; People v Herrnkind, 49 AD3d 555, 555 [2008]; People v Days, 31 AD3d 574, 575 [2006]; People v Green, 250 AD2d 143, 146-147 [1998]; People v Lea, 144 AD2d 863, 864-865 [1988]).
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contentions that the police detective’s testimony regarding two witnesses’ identification of him as the perpetrator of the charged crimes…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. SantiagoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. SavinonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CuttingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ArroyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.