Legal Opinion
Kettenbach v. Demoulas
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 6, 1995No. Civ. A. 92-10482-PBSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs Michael L. Kettenbach (“Kettenbach”) and Leland Properties, Inc., (“Leland”) 1 move for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(2) (Docket No. 208), or to supplement their pending motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59 (Docket No. 170), based on “newly discovered evidence.” 2
Specifically, this evidence is a recorded audiotape of a conversation between Christine Primo (“Primo”) and Edmund J. Browne, Jr., (“Browne”). Kettenbach argues that this tape contains incriminating statements by Browne admitting…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kattar v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Lans v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.