Legal Opinion

Ramboot, Inc. v. Lucas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 2007No. COA06-357PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

The three-year statute of limitations for a legal malpractice action begins to run “at the time of the occurrence of the last act of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action.” 1 Here, plaintiffs contend the filing of the dismissal with prejudice constituted the “last act” to give rise to their legal malpractice action. Because the final alleged act of malpractice occurred more than three years before the filing of the action, we affirm the trial court’s ruling that the subsequent filing of the dismissal with prejudice did not extend the statute of limitations for filing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. KeithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Hargett v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Jordan v. CrewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Sunbow Industries, Inc. v. LondonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Bolton v. CroneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babb v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Hackos v. Goodman, Allen & Filetti, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Ramboot, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API