Legal Opinion

Todd v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, Co., LPA

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 3, 2004No. C-1-03-171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Defendant Mark'N. Wise-man for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. # 40) and the Motion of Defendant ] Welt-man, Weinberg & Reis, Co., L.P.A., for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) (doc. #55). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions.

I. STANDARD FOR A RULE 12(C) MOTION

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) governs motions for judgment on the pleadings. In reviewing a motion under Rule 12(c), the Court accepts as true the factual…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foster v. D.B.S. Collection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Delawder v. Platinum Financial Services Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. Senftle v. LandauDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Gionis v. Javitch, Block & RathboneDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API