United States v. Dietz
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
This is an action to revoke defendant’s citizenship pursuant to the provisions of § 338 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1158, 8 U.S.C.A. § 738.
Defendant has moved to dismiss, claiming lack of jurisdiction in this Court for the reasons:(1) That the action should have been brought in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, where defendant was naturalized November 28, 1939.(2) That § 338 is “ex post facto” and not here invocable.
The Nationality Act of 1940 was a codification of previous statutes relating to Naturalization. Codification…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Schurmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- United States v. KuhnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HoltzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944