United States v. Holtz
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
Solely for the purpose of receiving evidence as to the principles and practices of the organization known as the German-American Bund, its predecessors and affiliates, all of the above entitled actions were consolidated for trial by order of this court heretofore entered with consent of all parties. Rule 42(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. By the order of consolidation there was reserved to each of the defendants the right to a separate trial on all other issues, save and except the common one for which consolidation was had. Each…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States Ex Rel. Harrington v. SchlotfeldtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Schurmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. KnauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Bechtel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. BreglerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944
- Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.