Tulare Irrigation District v. Collins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtItenshaw, J.
The plaintiff, Tulare Irrigation District,, is a public corporation organized under the act of the legislature, approved March 7,1887, generally known as the Wright. Act [Stats. 1887, p. 29], The other parties plaintiff are members of the board of directors of the irrigation district and owners of land within its territorial limits. In 1894 oneMosier recovered a judgment against the district for damages-suffered by him through the negligence of the district in flooding his land. The judgment was never satisfied, but was kept in force by subsequent actions thereon. In 1896 he caused execution…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- El Camino Irrigation District v. El Camino Land Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District v. Wutchumna Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Moody v. Provident Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.