Legal Opinion
People v. Buck
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 Cal.App.2d Supp. 912 (1950)
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
NORMAN H. BUCK, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Dec. 14, 1950.
Manuel Ruiz, Jr., for Appellants.
James Don Keller, District Attorney, and Duane J. Carnes, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.
BURCH, J.
The defendants were convicted of a violation of section 9 of San Diego County Ordinance No. 464 (N.S.) as amended by Ordinance No. 609 (N.S.), which provides that "it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or to be in actual physical control of any taxicab in the unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego without first…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buck v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Buck v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Buck v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952