Legal Opinion
Buck v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 21, 1952No. 165PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Minton
Appellants, American citizens, are taxicab drivers. They were arrested by the Sheriff of San Diego County, California, and charged with driving taxicabs in the unincorporated area of San Diego County without a permit from the Sheriff as required by § 9 of Ordinance 464, the pertinent provisions of which are set forth in the margin.* The facts were stipulated without the taking of any evidence. From the stipulation we learn that appellants had picked up passengers across the line in Mexico and were transporting them across the unincorporated area of San Diego County to points not in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kelly v. Washington Ex Rel. Foss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Francis v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State of Hawaii Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
- Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- United States v. Jonathan Howell Husband R. (Roach)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.