Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent, East Carroll Parish Prison Farm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In October of 1979, Billy Guice and Howard Claxton were convicted of “unlawful use of a moveable,” a misdemeanor, in violation of La.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 14:68 (West 1974), which is a lesser included offense of theft under Louisiana law. State v. Reeves, 342 So.2d 605 (La. 1977). Each petitioner was sentenced to six months imprisonment.
Petitioners contend that their convictions cannot stand under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm DesertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent, East Carroll Parish Prison Farm,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
- United States v. LaytonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Statistical Phone Philly v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.