Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. Long
Indiana Supreme Court
From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Claybaugh, Judge. Action by Charles J. Long against the Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.
This action was brought by appellee, an employe of appellant, for the recovery of wages for manual labor, also to recover penalties and attorneys’ fees under §§7056, 7057 Bums 1901; Acts 1885, p. 36, §§1, 2. An answer and counterclaim were filed by appellant. A trial of said cause by jury resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for the wages, penalties and .attorneys’ fees, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered thereon against appellant.
Several of the causes for a new trial call in question the right of the appellee to recover said penalty and attorneys’ fees under said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- S. A. & A. P. R'y Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
- Martin v. LoulaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Palmer v. StockbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.