Palmer v. Stockberger

— This is an appeal from a judgment on a suit for payment of wages brought by the appellee Kenneth Stockberger against the appellant Charles Palmer a,nd appellee William Hepler pursuant to the provisions of §§40-101 and 40-102, Burns’ 1952 Replacement. In- eluded therein was a claim for legitimate expenses incurred as a result of his employment. The issues were formed by the plaintiff’s (appellee Stockberger) complaint and the defendants’ (appellant Palmer and appellee Hepler) answers in denial and affirmance, respectively.

The cause was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury…