Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1923No. 24,000PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Albert Darnell, by affidavit, charged appellee with unlawfully failing and refusing to pay him $27, wages alleged to be due him from appellee, after demand and within 72 hours after he had quit appellee’s employment, in violation of §§7989e, 7989f Burns’ Supp. 1921, Acts 1915 p. 107, §§3 and 4. The trial court sustained appellee’s motion to quash, and that ruling is here assigned as error.
These sections read as follows: “Section 3. — Any person, firm, or corporation employing persons shall within seventy-two (72) hours after any employe voluntarily quits such service or is discharged, pay to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. FachmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Town of Walkerton v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Baesler's Super-Valu v. Indiana Commissioner of Labor Ex Rel. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Department of Financial Institutions v. General Finance Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1949
- DEPT. OF STATE REVENUE, INHERITANCE TAX DIV. v. Estate of CallawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.