Legal Opinion

Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. Demock

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 21, 2002No. 08-00-00206-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Appellant Casualty Reciprocal Exchange (“Casualty”) appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Julie Angela Demock (“Demoek”). The issue here is: Does a workers’ compensation carrier have a statutory subrogation right against the employee’s uninsured/underin-sured motorist insurance carrier after having recovered damages from the third-party tortfeasor?

The facts are undisputed and taken from Casualty’s brief. In the course and scope of her employment, Demock suffered severe injuries to her knee in a collision with Enriqueta Adame.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Watson v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. Dyess, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  5. Francis v. International Service Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Erivas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  2. Liberty Mutual v. Kinser, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. City of Corpus Christi v. Gomez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. Harris County, Texas v. Gerald Knapp and Narciso AuriolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Isabel Erivas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API