Legal Opinion
State v. Windle, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 2004No. Case No. 03CA16UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} Timothy R. Windle appeals the trial court's acceptance of his "no contest" plea to gross sexual imposition. He contends that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because the written plea form erroneously informed him that he could be subject to up to three years of post-release community control when he was actually subject to a mandatory five year term of post-release community control. Because the period of postrelease community control is part of an offender's sentence and Crim.R. 11(C)(2) requires that an offender understand the maximum…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LilesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Crish, 1-08-13 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. GasparenoOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Cortez, 5-07-06 (11-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.