Legal Opinion

Pelham Towers v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.

In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner landlord seeks a review of the determination of respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) directing the landlord to roll back the rental of the subject premises to an amount not exceeding that allowed under the New York City Rent Stabilization Law and directing a refund of overcharges. Petitioner contends that the premises are exempt from the Rent Stabilization Law by virtue of the fact that the premises are subject to a first mortgage guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).

*815This identical issue has heretofore and fairly recently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WittekSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Stoneridge Apts., Company v. LindsayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Federal Housing Commissioner v. ReeseCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edgemere at Somerset v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Mott v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Bianchi v. GanzYonkers City Court · 1975
  4. Second 82nd Corp. v. VrionisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API