Legal Opinion

Stoneridge Apts., Company v. Lindsay

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 4, 1969No. 69 Civ. 2405PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LASKER, District Judge.

This is one of a number of cases brought by landlord-plaintiffs attacking the constitutionality of Local Law 16 of 1969 of The City of New York. The plaintiff asks judgment on behalf of itself and others similarly situated declaring the local law unconstitutional for reasons stated below and enjoining its enforcement.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the owner of a Class A multiple dwelling in the City of New York (containing six or more housing units occupied by tenants), which is subject to a mortgage insured under the provisions of the National Housing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fink v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Choy v. Farragut Gardens 1, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Israel v. City Rent & Rehab. Admin. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Fieger v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v. Rent Control Board of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Hutton Park Gardens v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
  5. Tron v. CondelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API