Legal Opinion

Bicknell v. Herbert

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal prom- District Magistrate oe Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This is an action of assumpsit instituted in the district court of Honolulu for $96 and interest, attorneys’ commissions and costs. The declaration was dated June 30, 1909, and summons was issued the same day returnable July 2, 1909. Service of the summons was made on William Henry personally and as secretary of the Benton G. Mining Company, garnishee, on June 30, 1909. No personal service was made on the prin*133cipal defendant, who at that time was without the Territory of Hawaii; nor was there any service on him by publication. The only service which was made on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calasa v. GreenwellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. A. S. White & Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. L. B. Kerr & Co. v. GreenbaumHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Richardson v. PaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API