Legal Opinion
Calasa v. Greenwell
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 1981No. 7188; CIVIL NO. 2913PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BURNS, J.
This is an appeal of the trial court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant Greenwell’s Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP), Rule 60(b)(4), motion to vacate the Entry of Default and the Decree Quieting Title.
The issues are whether the trial court erred in deciding (1) that Greenwell did not bring his HRCP, Rule 60(b)(4), motion to vacate decree within a reasonable time; and (2) that Greenwell was properly served by publication pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 669-3 (1968, as amended) and 634-59 (1968, as amended). We answer (1) yes and (2) no and we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Stafford v. DickisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Herbert v. BicknellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Byrne v. AllenHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Falkner v. AMERIFIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. BartolomeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
- The Nature Conservancy v. NakilaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re the Guardianship of CarlsmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Klinger v. KepanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.