Legal Opinion
L. B. Kerr & Co. v. Greenbaum
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Reserved Question from Circuit Court, First Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
ROBERTSON, C. J.
The plaintiff, a Hawaiian corporation, instituted an action of assumpsit in the district court of Honolulu, against the defendants, copartners, and residents of New1 York, and alleged that the garnishee, also a Hawaiian corporation, is- indebted to the defendants. Summons issued in the usual form, the sheriff’s return thereto stating that the defendants are not inhabitants of the Territory of Hawaii and have never resided therein; that he served the garnishee by leaving a true and attested copy of the summons and declaration in said action with one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Herbert v. BicknellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Veeder Manufacturing Co. v. Marshall-Sanders Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Bicknell v. HerbertHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955