Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Cusimano

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1959No. 2277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

This appeal is the aftermath of several suits brought as the result of tw'o collisions, involving three cars, at a street intersection.

Suit was brought by Cusimano for personal injuries and property damages against defendants McDaniel and Spencer. The jury returned a verdict in his favor against McDaniel only. On the cross-claims filed by defendants, each charging the other with negligence, the jury found against the party bringing the claim in both instances. This appeal was taken by McDaniel from the judgment entered on the verdict against him in the original suit.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shu v. BasingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Lewis v. ShiffersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Cox v. Episcopal Eye, Ear and Throat HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Bankard v. LevinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baldi v. NimzakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Call Carl, Inc. v. DeadwylerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Bradley v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Clark v. Interstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Finkelstein v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API