Legal Opinion

Call Carl, Inc. v. Deadwyler

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1963No. 3044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

A D. C. Transit bus passed a stop sign and struck another motor Vehicle owned by appellant Call Carl, Inc., and driven by its employee, appellant Yenney. Mrs. Dead-wyler, a passenger on the bus, was injured in the collision and sued D. C. Transit, Call Carl, Inc., and Yenney as joint tortfeasors. D. C. Transit admitted its liability in the collision, but contended that Yenney and Call Carl, Inc., had also been negligent and that their negligence had been a concurring or contributing cause of the accident. Defendants also cross-claimed against each other for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ShiffersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Herndon v. HigdonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. McDaniel v. CusimanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Bankard v. LevinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Sacco v. GauNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. District of Columbia v. LapianaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API