Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1991No. 88-648Published

1Opinion of the Court

593 A.2d 591 (1991)

Jay FINKELSTEIN, Esquire, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry Barman, Appellant,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

No. 88-648.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued En Banc September 19, 1990.

Decided June 5, 1991.

Brian W. Shaughnessy, with whom Richard S. Sternberg and Philip A. Gagner were on the brief, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Susan S. McDonald, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Elizabeth…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ferren; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wagner.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API