Legal Opinion

Schneiberg v. Utz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

This is an action brought to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff, Frank Schneiberg, while an invitee upon premises operated and controlled by defendants, Eugene Utz and Ruth Utz. Although both are named as defendants in the prime action, it seems that Ruth Utz was the only defendant served with process and *536that Eugene Utz has not appeared in that action nor answered the complaint.

It is alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint, that at the time of the accident said Ruth Utz and Eugene Utz were the owners and in control of a hardware business, and that they also…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Opper v. Tripp Lake Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Bennett v. BirdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Schellhorn v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Franklin E. Tyrell, Inc. v. VahlsingNew York Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API