Legal Opinion
Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The plaintiffs in the three separate actions were injured on August 16, 1925, while passengers in a taxicab owned by the original defendants. The injuries resulted from a collision in which the taxicab was struck in the rear by a street car operated by the New York State Railways.
Plaintiffs brought separate actions against the parties with whom they had contracted for safe carriage. These defendants moved under sections 192 and 193 of the Civil Practice Act to have the street car company brought in as a party defendant in each action. The motion was granted.
The sections mentioned (so far as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Gittleman v. . FeltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hailfinger v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Fisher v. BullockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Bessey v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by16 opinions
- Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Nichols v. Clark, MacMullen & Riley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.