Legal Opinion

Franklin E. Tyrell, Inc. v. Vahlsing

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

In this action by a real estate broker to recover commissions from the owner of certain realty for whom he claims he produced a buyer, the owner has impleaded the alleged buyer by serving on him a third party summons and complaint, pursuant to section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act (added by L. 1946, ch. 971), which is a drastic amendment (eff. Sept. 1,1946) of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act. The buyer (third party) has moved to dismiss the claim alleged against him on the ground that the new enactment is not applicable to him in the circumstances; the defendants oppose the motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Clark, MacMullen & Riley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Kromback v. KillianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Lewis H. May Co. v. Mott Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McCormack v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. B. M. C. Manufacturing Corp. v. TarshisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Ammann & Whitney v. Edgarton & EdgartonNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. J. A. Ewing & McDonald, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  4. Rogoff v. ScheinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Schneiberg v. UtzNew York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API