Legal Opinion

Young v. Martin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1970No. 19030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

These two cases were dealt with by one consolidated order of the Greenville County Court, and were argued jointly before this court. The two cases arise out of an automobile collision which occurred in Greenville on December 14, 1967. Dorothy H. Young sues for personal injuries and we will refer to her claim as the wife’s case; James C. Young sues for loss of consortium, for medical expense paid on behalf of the wife, and for medical expense paid on behalf of his minor daughter, and we will refer to his claim as the husband’s case.

The wife’s case was tried on March 6,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bentley v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Burlington Hotel Corp. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Jackson v. Banks Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lucht Ex Rel. Estate of Lucht v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. In Re Asbestosis CasesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Lucht Ex Rel. Estate of Lucht v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Lucht Ex Rel. Estate of Lucht v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API