Burlington Hotel Corp. v. Dixon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdek, J.
Is a pleading or solemn admission put in the record by the pleader’s attorneys admissible in evidence against the pleader in a suit by the pleader against a third party involving the same question ?
The defendant offered in evidence excerpts from the agreed statement of facts signed by counsel for plaintiff and constituting a part of the record in the case of Burlington Hotel Corporation v. Bell. This agreed statement of facts admitted that the Hockenbury System was employed to sell stock and receive a commission upon such sales. The plaintiff objected to the admission of this evidence, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Norcum v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Mason v. . McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Smith v. . NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Alsworth v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Edgewood Knoll Apartments, Inc. v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Davis v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Young v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.