Legal Opinion

Burlington Hotel Corp. v. Dixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdek, J.

Is a pleading or solemn admission put in the record by the pleader’s attorneys admissible in evidence against the pleader in a suit by the pleader against a third party involving the same question ?

The defendant offered in evidence excerpts from the agreed statement of facts signed by counsel for plaintiff and constituting a part of the record in the case of Burlington Hotel Corporation v. Bell. This agreed statement of facts admitted that the Hockenbury System was employed to sell stock and receive a commission upon such sales. The plaintiff objected to the admission of this evidence, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Norcum v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Mason v. . McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Smith v. . NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Alsworth v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Edgewood Knoll Apartments, Inc. v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Davis v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API