Legal Opinion

William Leon Wallace v. John T. Willingham, Warden United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1965No. 8136_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

The trial court dismissed the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the exclusive remedy for his alleged illegal restraint was provided in Section 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. Appeal was allowed in forma pauperis and appointed counsel has advanced the rather novel argument that the prior unsuccessful proceedings under Section 2255 was “ineffective and inadequate” because the petitioner was not represented by counsel in those proceedings and the ancient writ is therefore available to test the cause of his restraint on the same grounds.

The facts are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Cleveland Roy Williams v. United States of America, Donald L. Davis v. United States of America, Christy Zoumah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. Mills v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Carl Oscar Letellier v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden v. Charles Ansel HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Johnnie Clifford McDowell v. John T. Willingham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API