Legal Opinion

United States v. Poole

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 31, 2008No. 07-7080PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

John Poole appeals his conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury on the basis that the jury’s verdict was impermissibly ambiguous. Mr. Poole points to the fact that, in addition to finding him guilty of assault resulting in serious bodily injury, the jury proceeded to find him guilty of the lesser included offense of simple assault — and did so despite the district court’s instruction that the jury should consider the lesser offense only if it found Mr. Poole not guilty of, or could not reach a verdict on, the greater offense. As it happens, however, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Pearson, EricCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. John Wayne Gacy v. George Welborn, Warden, Menard Correctional Center, and Roland W. Burris, Attorney General of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Brian Bafia, Michael Kerridan, John Cappas and Philip LaportaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Flores RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Sindi v. El-MoslimanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. State v. CirauloOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API