Legal Opinion

Wood v. Pynetree Paper Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1922No. 13002PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We are of the opinion that the petition fails to set forth a cause of action. Our decision, which is quoted above, has fixed the .law of the case. While the question then presented was one of' the sufficiency of the evidence, and that now presented deals with the sufficiency of the pleadings, yet the principle then announced will be controlling at this time in so far as the same may be applicable to the ease as pleaded. It may be well to observe that in considering whether there is evidence to warrant a verdict, the evidence will be construed most…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. TrussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. International Cotton Mills v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Southern Bauxite Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Dills v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Conaway v. McCrory Stores Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Henderson v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Dekle v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API