Legal Opinion
Durso v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 5, 2011No. Civil Action 10-02066 (HHK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Adrienne Durso, D. Chris Daniels, and Michelle Nemphos (on behalf of her minor child C.N.) bring this action against Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Administrator of the Transportation Safety Administration (“TSA”) John S. Pistole, challenging TSA’s use of advanced imaging technology (“AIT”) and aggressive pat-downs to screen airline passengers at airports. Plaintiffs allege that TSA’s use of these measures violates the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. Before the Court is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jonathan Blitz v. Janet NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Amerijet International, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Roberts v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Demir v. MayorkasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.