Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Napolitano

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 7, 2011No. Civil Action 10-01966 (HHK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Michael S. Roberts and Ann Poe bring this action against Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Administrator of the Transportation Safety Administration (“TSA”) John S. Pistole, alleging that TSA’s use of advanced imaging technology (“AIT”) and aggressive pat-downs to screen airline pilots at airports violates the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss [# 8], which argues that, because the challenged screening procedures are employed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amerijet International, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Halliday v. SpjuteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Long v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Michael Muir v. DHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  5. Scruggs v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API