Legal Opinion

Dubman v. North Shore Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1977No. 76-167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order imposing sanctions for a failure to make discovery. Plaintiff-respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion, concluding that the order is not appealable.

The complaint is for damages as a result of the alleged failure of the bank as secured party to exercise reasonable care to protect the collateral in its possession. The collateral was common stock. It is alleged that plaintiff wanted to sell the stock short and requested re-delivery of the collateral for the purpose of depositing it to satisfy margin requirements on the short sale. The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hauer v. ChristonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hyslop v. HyslopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gipson Lumber Co. v. SchicklingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Waukesha Roxo Co. v. GehrzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Furrenes v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mazurek v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HabermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API