Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Surefire Medical, INC.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 30, 2019No. 1:17-cv-02470Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 17-cv-02470-PAB-KLM DR. BRADLEY BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. SUREFIRE MEDICAL, INC. Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Surefire’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 59], Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 62], and Surefire’s Motion to Strike [Docket No. 74]. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. I. BACKGROUND This case involves a patented design for an anti-reflux catheter. See Docket No. 1 at 1.1 Plaintiff Dr. Bradley Barnett…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.