Legal Opinion

Lupo v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1973No. Civ. 42386PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FORD, P. J.

By an information petitioner Lupo was accused of the crime of attempt to receive stolen property. His motion to set aside the information on the ground that he was committed without reasonable or probable cause (Pen. Code, § 995) having been denied, petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition pursuant to the provisions of Penal Code section 999a.

The transcript of the preliminary hearing shows that a deputy sheriff, acting in an undercover capacity and accompanied by an informer, sold petitioner items of personal property which had been stolen but had been recovered. There was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. TriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Darr v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. People v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. CecilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API