Legal Opinion

Darr v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 15, 1977No. C-976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Defendant Darr was charged with attempted felony theft by receiving jewelry valued at $100 or more. See sections 18-2-101 and 18-4-401, C.R.S. 1973. Trial was to a jury. At the close of the prosecution’s case, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973, the district attorney appealed to the court of appeals which disapproved the trial court’s ruling and judgment of acquittal. People v. Darr, 37 Colo. App. 143, 551 P.2d 735 (1975).

We granted the defendant Darr’s petition for certiorari. After review, we affirm the court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. People v. Bel Air Equipment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. FrysigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. HenleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Bandy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. RiosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API